Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Archivio Istituziona...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
PubliCatt
Article . 2016
Data sources: PubliCatt
versions View all 5 versions
addClaim

Late open conversion after TEVAR.

Authors: MELISSANO , GERMANO; TSHOMBA, YAMUME; Mascia, Daniele; Baccellieri, Domenico; KAHLBERG, ANDREA LUITZ; Bertoglio, Luca; Nardelli, Pasquale; +2 Authors

Late open conversion after TEVAR.

Abstract

The aim of this paper was to characterize indications, describe repair methods and report outcomes of patients undergoing late open conversion (LOC) after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR).From to 1999 to 2015, 65 patients underwent redo procedures after TEVAR at our Institution. Thirty patients underwent LOC. The average time from the index TEVAR to LOC was 57 months (range 2-98 months). Indication to LOC was progression of distal aortic disease in nine patients (30%), stent-graft infection/fistulization in 10 (33.3%), retrograde dissection in 6 (20%), endoleak in 3 (10%), device migration/failure in 2 (6.7%). Left heart bypass and cerebrospinal fluid drainage were used in 22 (73.3%) and 16 (53.3%) cases, respectively. In 17 patients (56.6%) thoracic stent-graft was only partially removed and the proximal anastomosis was performed including the native aorta, the stent-graft and the surgical graft. Biological flap coverage with intercostal muscle flap was used 6 six of infected cases.Overall perioperative mortality rate was 16.6% (5 patients) - 20% in the subgroup of patients with stent-graft infection/fistulization (2 patients) and 33% in the subgroup with retrograde dissection (2 patients). Respiratory failure was the most common complication with seven cases (23.3%). Paraplegia was observed in 1 patient (3.3%). At a mean follow-up of 19 months (range, 5-63) there was 1 aortic-related death for aorto-esophageal fistula.Open conversion after TEVAR was feasible leaving in site the proximal segment of the thoracic stent-graft in most of the cases. The risk of death and morbidity was higher in case of infection, fistula and retrograde dissection.

Country
Italy
Keywords

Aged, 80 and over, Male, Reoperation, Time Factors, Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic, Databases, Factual, Endovascular Procedures, Aorta; Conversion to open surgery; Endovascular procedures; Thoracic; Surgery; Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Aorta; Conversion to open surgery; Endovascular procedures; Thoracic; Surgery; Medicine (all); Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Conversion to Open Surgery, Blood Vessel Prosthesis, Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation, Postoperative Complications, Treatment Outcome, Italy, Risk Factors, Disease Progression, Humans, Female, Stents, Aged, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    8
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
8
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!