Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Chromosomal microarray analysis of 2000 pediatric cases].

Authors: Haiming, Yuan; Junping, Zhu; Xiaoyan, Deng; Mengfan, Chen; Xinwei, Li; Qiuli, Li; Fen, Lyu;

[Chromosomal microarray analysis of 2000 pediatric cases].

Abstract

To assess the feasibility of chromosomal microarray analysis(CMA) for studying the correlation between birth defects and chromosomal aberrations.A total of 2000 patients with birth defects were recruited for the CMA testing.Five hundred twenty two patients (26.1%) were found to have chromosomal abnormalities. These included 24 cases with numerical abnormalities, 11 with mosaicisms, and 11 with uniparental disomies. The remaining 476 cases were of well-known microdeletion or microduplication syndromes. The advantage of CMA over conventional karyotyping was demonstrated in many cases.As a powerful tool for patients with birth defects, CMA can produce a higher diagnostic yield compared with conventional karyotyping.

Keywords

Adult, Male, Adolescent, Gene Dosage, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Chromosome Disorders, Child, Preschool, Karyotyping, Chromosomes, Human, Humans, Female, Child, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!