Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Isolated IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis].

Authors: Xiaolei, Liu; Zhiying, Yang; Haidong, Tan; Liguo, Liu; Yongliang, Sun; Shuang, Si; Li, Xu; +2 Authors

[Isolated IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis].

Abstract

To report five cases of isolated IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis (IAC) and to summarize their clinical characteristics and the differential diagnosis.The clinical data of five patients with isolated IAC were retrospectively analyzed, including laboratory tests, imaging examination and liver pathology. Their treatment and prognosis were also discussed.All five patients had no history of pancreatitis. All five patients presented with jaundice and three of them had fluctuant jaundice. The serum IgG4 levels was increased in all five patients. The images study showed bile duct stenosis in all 5 patients (2 in hilar bile duct, 2 in intrahepatic bile duct and 1 in hilar associated distal bile duct). The enlargement of pancreas was found in 2 patients. Liver pathology revealed fibrosis around small bile duct and IgG4-positive plasma cells infiltration in all 5 patients. Two patients underwent surgical procedure without relief. All five patients were relieved after the treatment of steroid. All patients were followed up from 6 months to 2 years and no recurrence was detected.Isolated IAC is a rare disease and it could be misdiagnosed as cholangiocarcinoma. The surgical procedure has the limited effect for the treatment of IAC and it should be avoided. IAC should be considered for patients with fluctuant jaundice of long history and enlargement of pancreas on imaging. Serum IgG4 test and liver biopsy are helpful for the diagnosis of IAC.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Biopsy, Cholangitis, Sclerosing, Cholangiocarcinoma, Diagnosis, Differential, Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic, Bile Duct Neoplasms, Pancreatitis, Immunoglobulin G, Humans, Steroids, Bile Ducts, Diagnostic Errors, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!