Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Treatment of Oncological Post-surgical Wound Dehiscence with Autologous Skin Micrografts.

Authors: Elisabetta, Baglioni; Letizia, Trovato; Marco, Marcarelli; Ambra, Frenello; Maria Alessandra, Bocchiotti;

Treatment of Oncological Post-surgical Wound Dehiscence with Autologous Skin Micrografts.

Abstract

The closure of postoperative wounds is essential in order to prevent surgical site infections or wound dehiscence, mainly in oncological patients. We aimed to demonstrate the efficacy of autologous micrografts in the management of wound dehiscence in an oncology patient undergoing decompressive spinal laminectomy.A 57-year-old man with IgG multiple myeloma and medullary plasmocytoma C7-T3, was to undergo decompressive spinal laminectomy and vertebral fixation leading to a wound dehiscence with exposed instrumentation. Autologous micrografts were obtained by Rigenera protocol and directly applied to the dehisced wound. After 60 days of negative pressure wound therapy, we observed reduction of the diameter and depth of wound dehiscence, with a coverage of instrumentation, without complete re-epithelialization, that instead was reached by application of autologous micrografts after 70 days.The Rigenera protocol may be the solution for complex wounds in oncological and immune-compromised patients where other treatments are contraindicated.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, Treatment Outcome, Surgical Wound Dehiscence, Laminectomy, Humans, Skin Transplantation, Middle Aged, Multiple Myeloma, Transplantation, Autologous, Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    14
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
14
Average
Average
Top 10%
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!