
pmid: 2694526
The stereoselectivity of the interaction with muscarinic receptors of enantiomers of a series of chiral antagonists is receptor subtype dependent. There is no overall relationship between stereoselectivity and receptor affinity. Depending on the antagonist studied, receptor stereoselectivity may indeed reflect: (1) the weakening or loss of a single interaction involving one of the four groups bound to the asymmetric carbon; (2) steric hindrance preventing optimum interaction of the low affinity steroisomer with the receptor; and/or (3) the inversion of the relative positions of two moieties of the ligand with similar structural and electronic properties i.e. comparable affinities for the two corresponding subsites in the receptor.
info:eu-repo/semantics/published
SCOPUS: cp.j
Muscarinic -- drug effects, Parasympatholytics, Stereoisomerism, Parasympatholytics -- pharmacology, Sciences bio-médicales et agricoles, Receptors, Muscarinic, Receptors, Muscarinic -- drug effects, Receptors, Animals, Humans
Muscarinic -- drug effects, Parasympatholytics, Stereoisomerism, Parasympatholytics -- pharmacology, Sciences bio-médicales et agricoles, Receptors, Muscarinic, Receptors, Muscarinic -- drug effects, Receptors, Animals, Humans
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 28 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
