Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Comparison of Several Optimization Schemes for the Induction and Expansion of Antibody-Mediated High Efficiency CIK (AMHE-CIK) In Vitro].

Authors: Xue, Yin; Xin, Xu; Yao, Zhao; Zhan-Ju, Wang; Hai-Ying, Wang; Zhen-Bo, Hu;

[Comparison of Several Optimization Schemes for the Induction and Expansion of Antibody-Mediated High Efficiency CIK (AMHE-CIK) In Vitro].

Abstract

To compare several schemes of inducing and expanding the antibody-mediated high efficiency CIK (AMHE-CIK) in vitro, so as to find out a method that can acquire a large number of cells capable to kill the tumor cells in a short time.Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMNC) from healthy volunteers was isolated and activated with CD3 antibody, then were cultured with the addition of different cytokines (IL-2, IL-4, G-CSF, GM-CSF, IFN-γ, TNF-α) for 14 days in vitro. The morphological changes of cells were observed by light microscopy. Based on the immunophenotypes of cells in each groups analyzed by flow cytometry, the cytokines capable to induce the dendritic cells and killer cells were screened out, respectively. According to different combination of cytokines, the cells were divided 4 groups: control, IL-2, group 1 (componant A included IL-2, IL-4, and GM-CSF. Componant B included IL-2, G-CSF, IFN-γ, and TNF-α), and group 2 (componant A included IL-2, IL-4, and GM-CSF. Componant B included IL-2, IL-4, G-CSF, IFN-γ, and TNF-α). The proliferation and differentiation of CD3(+) CD8(+) and CD3(+) CD56(+) cells were measured by flow cytometry after culture in vitro for 7 days.After inducing and expanding in vitro for 7 days, the cell proliferation rate of control group, IL-2 group, group 1 and group 2 were 1.57 ± 0.01, 4.17 ± 0.16, 5 ± 0.47, 7.17 ± 0.24-folds, respectively. The differences between IL-2 group, group 1, group 2 and control group were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The immunophenotype analysis showed that the proportion of CD3(+) CD8(+) induced by each protocol was 13.96 ± 0.23%, 26.33 ± 0.55%, 36.83 ± 0.34% and 35.88 ± 0.16%, respectively. The proportion of CD3(+) CD8(+) in group 1 and 2 was higher than that in IL-2 group (P < 0.05), but the difference between them was not significant (P < 0.05). The proportions of CD3(+) CD56(+) induced by each protocol were 11.03 ± 0.28%, 29.31 ± 0.60%, 39.96 ± 0.38% and 29.33 ± 0.54%, respectively, the proportion of group 1 was higher than that of IL-2 group and group 2 (P < 0.05), but the difference between IL-2 group and group 2 was not significant (P < 0.05).The group 1 protocol obtained from this study can promote the proliferation of DC-CIK and also increase the proportion of the tumor killing cells (CD3(+) CD8(+) and CD3(+) CD56(+)).

Related Organizations
Keywords

Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha, Cell Culture Techniques, Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor, Culture Media, Immunophenotyping, Interferon-gamma, Cytokine-Induced Killer Cells, Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor, Humans, Interleukin-2, Interleukin-4, Cells, Cultured

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!