
The valve-in-valve (ViV) procedure is an option for patients with symptomatic structural degeneration of a bioprosthesis and excessive reoperative risk. The risk of coronary obstruction appears to be increased if ViV is performed for certain pericardial prostheses in which the leaflets are mounted outside the stent posts. Herein is described a successful ViV for a degenerated Trifecta aortic bioprosthesis, and the technical considerations for performing a ViV procedure within such types of prosthesis are considered. Emphasis is placed on the importance of preoperative investigations (computed tomography scan-based measurements of coronary ostial height and of sinus of Valsalva diameters), and on the precise deployment of the valve (transapical approach with transesophageal echocardiography control) to minimize the risk of major complications. The presence of a failing Trifecta bioprosthesis should not be considered an absolute contraindication to ViV on the basis of the risk of coronary obstruction.
Aged, 80 and over, Bioprosthesis, Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation, Cardiac Catheterization, Time Factors, Aortic Valve Insufficiency, Aortic Valve Stenosis, Prosthesis Design, Aortography, Severity of Illness Index, Echocardiography, Doppler, Color, Prosthesis Failure, [SDV] Life Sciences [q-bio], Treatment Outcome, Aortic Valve, Heart Valve Prosthesis, Feasibility Studies, Humans, implantation, Female, Echocardiography, Transesophageal
Aged, 80 and over, Bioprosthesis, Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation, Cardiac Catheterization, Time Factors, Aortic Valve Insufficiency, Aortic Valve Stenosis, Prosthesis Design, Aortography, Severity of Illness Index, Echocardiography, Doppler, Color, Prosthesis Failure, [SDV] Life Sciences [q-bio], Treatment Outcome, Aortic Valve, Heart Valve Prosthesis, Feasibility Studies, Humans, implantation, Female, Echocardiography, Transesophageal
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
