Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Fluorouracil Filtering Surgery Study one-year follow-up. The Fluorouracil Filtering Surgery Study Group.

Fluorouracil Filtering Surgery Study one-year follow-up. The Fluorouracil Filtering Surgery Study Group.

Abstract

Two hundred thirteen patients participated in the Fluorouracil Filtering Surgery Study, a randomized clinical trial, to determine the efficacy and safety of subconjunctivally injected 5-fluorouracil after filtering surgery in eyes with poor prognoses. Twenty-eight (27%) of the 105 eyes in the 5-fluorouracil group and 54 (50%) of the 108 eyes in the standard group were classified as failures, defined by reoperation for control of intraocular pressure during the first year or an intraocular pressure greater than 21 mm Hg at the one-year visit (P = .0007, Mantel-Haenszel chi-square). Corneal epithelial toxicity and transient visual acuity loss were more common in the 5-fluorouracil group (P less than .001, chi-square); however, the visual acuities and the mean visual field sensitivities were not significantly different at one year. We recommend the use of subconjunctivally injected 5-fluorouracil after trabeculectomy in eyes with uncontrolled glaucoma and poor prognoses, specifically after previous cataract extraction or unsuccessful filtering surgery.

Keywords

Adult, Male, Reoperation, Chi-Square Distribution, Glaucoma, Middle Aged, Postoperative Complications, Bias, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Humans, Multicenter Studies as Topic, Female, Life Tables, Fluorouracil, Prospective Studies, Intraocular Pressure, Aged, Follow-Up Studies, Proportional Hazards Models, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    359
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 1%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 0.1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 1%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
359
Top 1%
Top 0.1%
Top 1%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!