Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Premedication in ENT operations under local anesthesia].

Authors: J C, van Drie; S, van der Baan; J J, Nauta; L H, Booij; L, Feenstra;

[Premedication in ENT operations under local anesthesia].

Abstract

Midazolam 15 mg orally, was compared with the combination of pentobarbital, promethazine, opial and scopolamine as premedication for ear surgery under local anaesthesia in the first of a series of three double blind clinical trials. Sedation, pain sensation and appreciation by patient and surgeon alike were in favour of the pentobarbital regime. Anxiolysis was the same for both regimes. The number of actions needed to administer the medication was basically lower for midazolam. Comparing in a similar, second study midazolam 15 mg with higher doses of 20 mg and 25 mg, the results were satisfactory with the highest dose. Pain during the administration of the local anaesthesia was felt in 16% of the patients. Adding 10 mg morphine intramuscularly in a third study did not prove to diminish the percentage of patients with pain complaints. It is concluded that 25 mg midazolam taken orally 45 minutes pre-operatively is a satisfactory premedication for ear surgery and less troublesome than the pentobarbital, promethazine, opial, scopolamine we used before. In day-care surgery this short acting premedication in our opinion is quite useful.

Keywords

Adult, Male, Narcotics, Adolescent, Midazolam, Scopolamine, Middle Aged, Promethazine, Drug Combinations, Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases, Humans, Female, Pentobarbital, Preanesthetic Medication, Aged, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!