[The 2014 consensus conference of the ISUP on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma].

G, Kristiansen; L, Egevad; M, Amin; B, Delahunt; J R, Srigley; P A, Humphrey; J I, Epstein

Found an issue? Give us feedback

Der Pathologearrow_drop_down

Der Pathologe

Article . 2017

Data sources: Europe PubMed Central

[The 2014 consensus conference of the ISUP on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma].

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 09 Jan 2017 German Journal:Der Pathologe, volume 37 (issn: 1432-1963,

Copyright policy )

Authors: G, Kristiansen; L, Egevad; M, Amin; B, Delahunt; J R, Srigley; P A, Humphrey; J I, Epstein;

pmid: 26809207

[The 2014 consensus conference of the ISUP on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma].

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

In 2005 the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) held a concensus conference on Gleason grading in order to bring this grading system up to the current state of contemporary practice; however, it became clear that further modifications on the grading of prostatic carcinoma were necessary. The International Society of Urological Pathology therefore held a further consensus conference in 2014 to clarify these points. This article presents the essential results of the Chicago grading meeting.

Related Organizations

View all View all

Keywords

Chicago, Male, International Cooperation, Prostate, Prostatic Neoplasms, Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous, Carcinoma, Ductal, Humans, Neoplasm Grading, Societies, Medical, Forecasting

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	15
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 10%
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Top 10%
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 10%