Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Corneal neovascularisation treatments compared: Subconjunctival bevacizumab injections and/or photodynamic therapy].

Authors: J, Hamdan; M, Boulze; A, Aziz; G, Alessi; L, Hoffart;

[Corneal neovascularisation treatments compared: Subconjunctival bevacizumab injections and/or photodynamic therapy].

Abstract

To evaluate and compare the efficacy of subconjunctival bevacizumab injections alone, photodynamic therapy alone and combined treatments for reduction of corneal neovascularization.This study was conducted as a prospective case series. A total of seven eyes of 7 patients with corneal neovascularization caused by ocular surface disorders including fungal infectious keratitis and penetrating keratoplasty were included in the study. Patients were randomized into the three following groups: patients in group A received a single subconjunctival injection of 10mg (0.4mL) of bevacizumab, patients in group B were treated with photodynamic therapy with verteporfin (6mg/m(2)) to the neovascularized area and those in group C received a subconjunctival injection of bevacizumab and photodynamic therapy 7 days later. Morphological changes in neovascularization were evaluated over 6 months using slit-lamp biomicroscopy and digital corneal photography. A computer-assisted semi-automatic analysis of the area of corneal neovascularization was performed with Image J software.Recession of corneal vessels was observed in all eyes at 1 month post-treatment. The neovascularized surface area in all groups combined showed a decrease in the first month after treatment and this decrease continued up to the 6th month. The surface area of corneal neovascularization decreased by 34.05±8.28% in group A (subconjunctival injection of bevacizumab), by 42.06±28.36% in group B (photodynamic therapy with verteporfin) and by 51.67±18.93% in group C (combined subconjunctival injection of bevacizumab and photodynamic therapy). A combined treatment consisting of a subconjunctival injection followed by a PDT session 7 days later might be more effective for the treatment of corneal neovascularisation. No serious local or systemic adverse events were observed.Our medium-term results suggest that combined subconjunctival injection of bevacizumab and photodynamic therapy with verteporfin might be used safely and effectively to reduce corneal neovascularization surface. This combined therapy may show a tendency toward greater efficacy than the individual monotherapies. Controlled prospective randomized multicentric trials with a larger sample size are necessary to assess long-term efficacy and to confirm these results.

Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Photosensitizing Agents, Porphyrins, Verteporfin, Angiogenesis Inhibitors, Middle Aged, Combined Modality Therapy, Bevacizumab, Treatment Outcome, Photochemotherapy, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Humans, Corneal Neovascularization, Female, Prospective Studies, Injections, Intraocular, Aged, Follow-Up Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    6
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
6
Top 10%
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!