
The introduction of laparoscopy as a surgical technique provided a method preventing major abdominal wall incisions and improving recovery of the patient after surgery. In abdominal wall surgery laparoscopic ventral hernia repair has proven to be at least as save as open repair. However, the technique of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair has not been standardized. Despite all the research that has been conducted and all the articles that were published, there still seems to be absence of consensus about the best method to repair a ventral hernia.To review knowledge on incisional hernias and discuss several controversies regarding the laparoscopic management of ventral hernias.A review of the literature was undertaken.A search identified twenty records: six RCTs on incisional hernias, five RCTs on ventral hernias and nine reviews or meta-analyses. Interpretation of the scientific data is difficult because the outcomes in literature are often based on pooled data of primary ventral hernias and incisional ventral hernias. Controversy remains regarding the optimal laparoscopic management of ventral hernias in terms of selection of patients for laparoscopic repair, optimal technique, outcomes and cost-efficacy.Lack of evidence allows persisting controversies in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. RCTs and registries are necessary to document efficacy, morbidity, quality of life and costs during a sufficient period of time to provide clinicians with the evidence required to make the right choice for the best surgical technique.
Evidence-Based Medicine, Treatment Outcome, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Recurrence, Humans, Laparoscopy, Surgical Mesh, Hernia, Ventral, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Evidence-Based Medicine, Treatment Outcome, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Recurrence, Humans, Laparoscopy, Surgical Mesh, Hernia, Ventral, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
