
This evaluation of patient transfer systems was prepared to give our readers an overview of these devices--their value within the hospital to both patients and staff, the currently available models, and our recommendations for the best use of each model. Because the devices differ from one another in both design and application, we did not apply our typical rating system in evaluating them. We performed patient transfers using four patient transfer systems from four manufacturers, comparing them with transfers made with a drawsheet, and assessed their ease of transfer, patient comfort, portability, setup time, and ease of cleaning. Compared with the drawsheet, all of the devices reduce the effort required for patient transfer. Most hospitals will find that no single device meets all of their needs and that a combination of several is appropriate. We welcome reader responses about this evaluation format.
Technology Assessment, Biomedical, Transportation of Patients, Equipment and Supplies, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Humans, Equipment Design
Technology Assessment, Biomedical, Transportation of Patients, Equipment and Supplies, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Humans, Equipment Design
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
