Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Ondokuz Mayıs Univer...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Intraoperative nerve monitoring in thyroid surgery.

Authors: Polat, Ayfer Kamali; Lap, Gokhan; Ozbalci, Selcuk; Karabulut, Kagan; Gungor, Bulent; Polat, Cafer; Erzurumlu, Kenan;

Intraoperative nerve monitoring in thyroid surgery.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nerve injury is one of the specific complications of thyroid surgery despite many advances in surgical technique. The recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) and the external branch of superior laryngeal nerve are the nerves at risk during thyroid surgery (1). Morbidity related to recurrent laryngeal nerve injury varies from changes in voice quality to severe dyspnea requiring tracheal intubation or tracheostomy. To minimize the risk of nerve injury, intraoperative nerve monitoring (IONM) being suggested as a tool for helping visual control for RLN has gained significant interest in recent years (1,2). We aimed to determine the effectiveness of nerve monitoring during thyroid surgery and to provide a clinical experience. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was performed from June 2010 to June 2012. We prospectively evaluated 94 patients who had thyroid surgery with or without nerve monitoring. Of those patients 48 were in monitored group (M) and 46 were in unmonitored group (UM). RESULTS: The mean age was 48 (27-76) in M group and 52 (73-17) in UM There was only one patient had transient hoarseness in M group and also one patient had transient hoarseness in UM group. One each in both groups had persistent hoarseness. No patients experienced airway problem. Operation time was significantly shorter in M group (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Use of a nerve monitoring system does not substitute for careful dissection and visual identification of nerves, but monitoring can assist the surgeon in identifying the RLN anatomic variability and may decrease the operation time during thyroid surgery.

Funding support for the conduct of this research was received from the University of Ondokuz Mayis.

University of Ondokuz MayisOndokuz Mayis University

WOS: 000359179400004

PubMed: 26098232

Country
Turkey
Related Organizations
Keywords

Thyroid, Adult, Complications, Injuries, Nerve monitoring injury, Adolescent, Thyroid Gland, Middle Aged, surgery, Young Adult, Monitoring, Intraoperative, Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Injuries, Operation time, Humans, Intraoperative Complications, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    The total number of citations received by all articles of the researcher of interest.
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 131
  • 131
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
citations
The total number of citations received by all articles of the researcher of interest.
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
131
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!