
pmid: 26091139
handle: 2434/789645
Dramatic improvements in the local recurrence rate of patients with rectal cancer have been observed after the introduction of the embriologically-based concept of total mesorectal excision by Heald more than 30 years ago. During the last decades, advances in multimodal treatment have further contributed to improve outcomes, but surgery still play a major role. Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer has been validated in randomized controlled trials to be oncologically as safe and effective as the open approach with better short-term postoperative outcomes. Nevertheless, laparoscopic low anterior resection continues to be challenging because of technical constraints and a steep learning curve. Robotic surgery may potentially offer significant advantages in rectal cancer surgery thanks to its technological features. This paper summarizes the current available evidence and highlights the most challenging aspects of robotic low anterior resection, with supporting data from the literature and from the authors' nearly ten-year experience in the field.
Evidence-Based Medicine, Rectal Neoplasms, Robotic surgical procedures; Rectal neoplasms; Surgical procedures, minimally invasive, Survival Analysis, Observational Studies as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Robotic Surgical Procedures, Humans, Laparoscopy, Colectomy, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Evidence-Based Medicine, Rectal Neoplasms, Robotic surgical procedures; Rectal neoplasms; Surgical procedures, minimally invasive, Survival Analysis, Observational Studies as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Robotic Surgical Procedures, Humans, Laparoscopy, Colectomy, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
