
Postoperative refractive outcome largely depends on the accuracy of calculating power of implanted IOL. Lens power calculation can be done by conventional ultrasound biometry and partial coherence laser interferometry (IOL Master). The aim was to compare the accuracy of IOL power calculations using conventional ultrasound biometry and partial coherence laser interferometry.40 eyes were included in this prospective randomized trial. Twenty eyes underwent IOL master and 20 eyes had aplanation ultrasound biometry. There were included only eyes with age-related cataract and postoperative natural visual acuity (VA) 0.7. Visual acuity was performed 6 weeks after cataract surgery. After 6 weeks best natural visual acuity were 0.9 (± 0.1) in IOL-Master group and 0.85 (± 0.15) in ultrasound biometry. The postoperative mean absolute refractive error was 0.75 (± 0.5) D for ultrasound biometry and 0.50 (± 0.50) D for IOL-Master. Optical biometry with the IOL-Master proved to be slightly more accurate than ultrasound biometry for IOL power calculation.
Aged, 80 and over, Lenses, Intraocular, Male, Biometry, IOL power calculation, Visual Acuity, Reproducibility of Results, Cataract Extraction, Middle Aged, Eye, Refractive Errors, Cataract, High-Energy Shock Waves, Interferometry, IOL Master ; ultrasound biometry ; IOL power calculation, Lens Implantation, Intraocular, ultrasound biometry, Humans, IOL Master, Female, Prospective Studies, Aged, Ultrasonography
Aged, 80 and over, Lenses, Intraocular, Male, Biometry, IOL power calculation, Visual Acuity, Reproducibility of Results, Cataract Extraction, Middle Aged, Eye, Refractive Errors, Cataract, High-Energy Shock Waves, Interferometry, IOL Master ; ultrasound biometry ; IOL power calculation, Lens Implantation, Intraocular, ultrasound biometry, Humans, IOL Master, Female, Prospective Studies, Aged, Ultrasonography
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
