Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ HRČAK - Portal of Cr...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

The lymph node roundness index in the evaluation of lymph nodes of the neck.

Authors: Krišto, Branko; Buljan, Marko;

The lymph node roundness index in the evaluation of lymph nodes of the neck.

Abstract

The study assessed the validity of the lymph node "roundness index" (RI) in the evaluation of enlarged lymph nodes of the neck. A total of 107 subjects were included in the prospective study, and 135 enlarged lymph nodes were examined. All the subjects were examined clinically and sonographically, the lymph node roundness index was determined, and soon after the nodes was surgically removed and pathohistologically diagnosed. On the basis of pathohistological diagnosis the study subjects were divided into two groups. The first group consisted of patients with benign lymph nodes, and the second one comprised patients with malignant nodes. The second group was further divided into two sub-groups: those with primary malignant nodes and those with secondary lymph nodes (metastases). The study showed that the lymph node RI statistically differs between the groups. In benign lymphadenopathy the RI was 1.66 ± 0.26, in primary malignant lymphadenopathy it was 1.31 ± 0.25 and in secondary malignant lymphadenopathy 1.13 ± 0.11. The analysis demonstrated that 82.9% of subjects randomly chosen from the group with primary malignant lymphadenopathy and 94.6% from the group with the secondary malignant lymphadenopathy have a smaller RI compared to randomly chosen subjects from the group with benign lymphadenopathy. Sensitivity of the method for primary malignant lymphadenopathy was 66.7% and specificity was 92.9%. For secondary malignant lymphadenopathy the sensitivity was 95.5% and specificity 92.9%. Based on this result we can conclude that the lymph node RI is a valid, simple, cost-effective and non-aggressive method which may "increase the suspicion" for a benign or malignant lymphadenopathy. RI ≤ 1.5 is indicative of malignant lymphadenopathy and RI ≥ 1.5 of benign lymphadenopathy.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Inflammation, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Reproducibility of Results, ultrasonography, Sensitivity and Specificity, Diagnosis, Differential, Paraganglioma, ROC Curve, Head and Neck Neoplasms, lymphadenopathy, Lymphatic Metastasis, Humans, Lymph Nodes, Prospective Studies, roundness index, Lymphatic Diseases, Probability, Ultrasonography

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold