Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Prognostic Value of Total Lesion Glycolysis Measured by 18F-FDG-PET/CT in Patients with Colorectal Cancer.

Authors: Shimpei, Ogawa; Michio, Itabashi; Chisato, Kondo; Mitsuru, Momose; Shuji, Sakai; Shingo, Kameoka;

Prognostic Value of Total Lesion Glycolysis Measured by 18F-FDG-PET/CT in Patients with Colorectal Cancer.

Abstract

[(18)F]Fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography with computed tomography ((18)F-FDG-PET/CT) was assessed regarding its utility in prediction of outcomes after curative resection of colorectal cancer.Preoperative (18)F-FDG-PET/CT was performed in 325 patients with colorectal cancer. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), mean SUV (SUVmean), metabolic volume (MV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were measured. Patients were divided into groups using cut-offs for overall survival (OS). (18)F-FDG-PET/CT parameters and other clinicopathological factors were investigated as prognostic factors.The 5-year OS rates in the low and high SUVmax, SUVmean, MV, and TLG groups were 91.4% and 87.0% (p=0.238), 90.8% and 88.2% (p=0.453), 91.7% and 83.8% (p=0.006), and 92.1% and 70.1% (p=0.001), respectively, indicating poorer outcomes in patients with high MV and TLG. In multivariate analysis, high TLG, age ≥65 years, rectal tumor location, and pN(+) were independent factors predicting a poor prognosis.TLG in (18)F-FDG-PET/CT is a prognostic parameter for colorectal cancer after curative resection.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Multimodal Imaging, Survival Analysis, Fluorodeoxyglucose F18, Positron-Emission Tomography, Humans, Female, Colorectal Neoplasms, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Glycolysis, Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Proportional Hazards Models

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    21
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
21
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!