Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Transplantation immunology.

Authors: V, Warvariv; S, Inokuchi; C O, Esquivel;

Transplantation immunology.

Abstract

The replacement of diseased or damaged organs by transplantation became a reality in 1954, when a kidney was transplanted from one monozygotic twin to another. Barring technical difficulties, a graft between genetically identical (syngeneic) individuals is readily accepted and is termed an isograft. An allograft is a transplant between allogeneic (genetically not-identical) members of a given species, whereas a xenograft crosses species lines. Allografts and xenografts provoke a strong immunological response which, unless suppressed, leads to rejection and graft loss. Immunological processes involved in rejection include humoral (B-cell) and cellular (T-cell) components that are both antigen specific and non-specific. 45 years ago Peter Medawar and his colleagues established that rejection has an immunological basis. From studies of skin grafts between animals, they demonstrated that transplantation immunity was actively acquired, systemically propagated and highly specific. Previous exposure to donor antigens was shown to lead to the sensitization of the recipient and resulted in a markedly accelerated rejection upon re-exposure to the same antigens. Also at this time, the possibility of transplantation tolerance, or specific allograft unresponsiveness was first described in an animal bone marrow chimera model. The greatest challenge in clinical transplantation today is to develop in the organ recipient a state of immunologic non-responsiveness to the organ while preserving the ability for immune surveillance and function necessary for life.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!