Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Optimal surgical approach for esophagogastric junction carcinoma].

Authors: Hiroharu, Yamashita; Yasuyuki, Seto;

[Optimal surgical approach for esophagogastric junction carcinoma].

Abstract

Esophagogastric junction (EGJ) carcinoma, representing carcinoma involving the anatomical border between the esophagus and stomach, has attracted considerable attention recently because of the marked increase in its incidence. In patients with cancer of the EGJ, comparable outcomes have been obtained with extended esophagectomy and total gastrectomy, and therefore the optimal surgical approach for EGJ tumors remains to be clarified. According to retrospective studies, nodal metastases are frequent in pericardial nodes (no. 1 and no. 2), the lesser curve node (no. 3), and along the left gastric artery node (no. 7), followed by the lower mediastinal paraesophageal node (no. 110) and suprapancreatic nodes (no. 8a, 9, 11p). Nodes along the distal stomach are rarely involved, and therefore total gastrectomy seems unlikely to be justified for prophylactic lymphadenectomy for EGJ carcinoma. Subgroup analysis showed that neither esophagectomy via right thoracotomy nor left thoracoabdominal extended total gastrectomy offered a survival benefit over the transhiatal procedure in Siewert type II carcinoma. Patients with nodal involvement are at high risk of systemic recurrence, and therefore perioperative adjuvant therapy may be as important as the extent of resection in this tumor entity.

Keywords

Esophageal Neoplasms, Adenocarcinoma, Esophagectomy, Chemotherapy, Adjuvant, Gastrectomy, Stomach Neoplasms, Lymphatic Metastasis, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Humans, Lymph Node Excision, Esophagogastric Junction, Digestive System Surgical Procedures, Neoplasm Staging

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!