Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Sialylated Lewis(x) and sialylated Lewis(a) as tumor-associated carbohydrate antigens in sera of patients with gastric cancer--usefulness of combination assay of these two antigens].

Authors: T, Nakagoe; M, Hirota; K, Hiratani; K, Fukushima; T, Shimoyama; T, Miura; M, Tomita; +2 Authors

[Sialylated Lewis(x) and sialylated Lewis(a) as tumor-associated carbohydrate antigens in sera of patients with gastric cancer--usefulness of combination assay of these two antigens].

Abstract

Sialylated Lewis(x) and sialylated Lewis(a) antigens, which are structural isomer each other, were serologically tested to determine the clinicopathological differences and correlation between two antigens, and were also compared with those of serum CEA in 141 patients with gastric cancer. Percent positives in sialylated Lewis(a), CEA and sialylated Lewis(x) showed 26.9%, 21.8% and 17.0% respectively. Percent positive of sialylated Lewis(x) correlated with degree of liver metastasis and peritoneal dissemination. Therefore, it is emphasized that the role of sialylated Lewis(x) is characteristics of detecting a presence of liver metastasis and/or peritoneal dissemination. On the other hand, sialylated Lewis(a) showed high percent positive in cases which had lymph nodes metastasis and mucinous or papillary adenocarcinomas. These two carbohydrate antigens indicated no correlation (r = 0.062) in the spectrum of sera. It is suggested that combination assay of sialylated Lewis(x) and sialylated Lewis(a) is useful in detecting many gastric cancer patients including CEA-negative one.

Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Lewis X Antigen, Adenocarcinoma, Middle Aged, Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous, Carcinoma, Papillary, Carcinoembryonic Antigen, Stomach Neoplasms, Humans, Antigens, Tumor-Associated, Carbohydrate, Glycolipids, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!