
pmid: 25515385
OBJECTIVE: To study whether patients require video consultations in general practice and whether or not video consultation is feasible. DESIGN: Semi-structured interviews and a pilot study in practice. METHOD: We interviewed 25 visitors to the general practice on their views on video consultations in a health centre in the eastern part of the Netherlands. Furthermore, we studied and evaluated the feasibility of video consultation for 21 patients. RESULTS: Patients' opinions on video consultations differed. Few patients felt that video consultation was suitable for a first contact in a disease episode, and hardly any patient saw possibilities for video consultations from their work station. Many patients favoured the possibility of specialists or family members joining the consultation from a remote location. Although technical problems occurred in more than 80% of consultations, over 80% of patients were satisfied after the video consultation had taken place. CONCLUSION: The need for video consultation in general practice is limited. Although many technical problems occurred, video consultations are feasible and can be conducted satisfactorily in practice.
Contains fulltext : 137331.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access)
Radboudumc 18: Healthcare improvement science RIHS: Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Adult, Male, Health Services Needs and Demand, Physician-Patient Relations, Adolescent, General Practice, Video Recording, Pilot Projects, Middle Aged, Young Adult, Patient Satisfaction, Feasibility Studies, Humans, Female, Child, Referral and Consultation, Aged, Netherlands
Radboudumc 18: Healthcare improvement science RIHS: Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Adult, Male, Health Services Needs and Demand, Physician-Patient Relations, Adolescent, General Practice, Video Recording, Pilot Projects, Middle Aged, Young Adult, Patient Satisfaction, Feasibility Studies, Humans, Female, Child, Referral and Consultation, Aged, Netherlands
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
