
A critical review of the literature is presented concerning prognostic factors in hepatocarcinoma, notably after surgical resection. Several factors would not seem to play an important prognostic role: age, liver function, alpha fetoprotein level or histological staging of the tumor. Other debatable factors include: sex, since females have a better prognosis, the existence of cirrhosis and the surgical margin of security. On the other hand the situation is clear regarding several other factors such as: size of the tumor, the severity of cirrhosis, the number of nodules, the macroscopic existence of a capsule and the presence or otherwise of portal invasion.
Adult, Liver Cirrhosis, Male, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, Adolescent, Portal Vein, Liver Neoplasms, Age Factors, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Neoplasms, Multiple Primary, Neoplasm Seeding, Sex Factors, Hepatectomy, Humans, Female, Child, Aged
Adult, Liver Cirrhosis, Male, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, Adolescent, Portal Vein, Liver Neoplasms, Age Factors, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Neoplasms, Multiple Primary, Neoplasm Seeding, Sex Factors, Hepatectomy, Humans, Female, Child, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
