Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Bilateral breast cancer.

Authors: R A, Pomerantz; T, Murad; J R, Hines;

Bilateral breast cancer.

Abstract

The magnitude of the clinical problem of bilateral occurrence of breast cancer is controversial. In order to evaluate clinical and pathologic factors associated with increased risk for metachronous, contralateral breast cancer, we reviewed the records of 187 patients undergoing operative treatment for primary breast cancer by the same surgeon at a single institution. Variables analyzed included age, race, history of tuberculosis or cancer at other sites, family history of breast cancer or cancer at other sites, prior use of estrogens, tobacco, and alcohol, marital status, parity, age at first pregnancy, tumor size and location, histologic diagnosis, degree of cellular differentiation and involvement of axillary lymph nodes. The incidence of metachronous, contralateral breast cancer was 11.8 per cent. The only factor with a statistically significant association with bilateral cancer was histologic diagnosis characterized by multicentricity. Life table survival analysis revealed that the five-year survival following treatment for metachronous, contralateral cancer was 59 per cent. We conclude that bilateral breast cancer is a significant clinical problem, that histology characterized by multicentricity is associated with a higher incidence of bilateral breast cancer, and that favorable survival justifies an aggressive approach.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Neoplasms, Multiple Primary, Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating, Risk Factors, Age Factors, Humans, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    29
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
29
Average
Top 10%
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!