Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Risk factors for duodenal stump leakage after gastrectomy for gastric cancer and management technique of stump leakage.

Authors: Ki-Han, Kim; Min-Chan, Kim; Ghap-Joong, Jung;

Risk factors for duodenal stump leakage after gastrectomy for gastric cancer and management technique of stump leakage.

Abstract

The goal of this study was to elucidate the risk factors for duodenal stump leakage after gastrectomy for gastric cancer. In addition, the management of duodenal stump leakage is reviewed.From January 2002 through December 2012, 1,195 patients with gastric cancer who underwent gastric R0 resection were enrolled in this study. The clinicopathologic features, postoperative outcomes (i.e., operation time, hospital stay, surgical procedures, method of duodenal stump closure, retrieved lymph nodes), and the risk factors of duodenal stump leakage were analyzed.Of the 1,195 patients, 13 patients (1.1%) suffered duodenal stump leakage. Most of the patients with duodenal stump leakage were male (92.3%). Nine patients underwent a subtotal gastrectomy with Billroth- II or Roux-en-Y anastomosis; the other four patients underwent a total gastrectomy with a Roux-en-Y anastomosis. There were two mortalities. With univariate and multivariate analysis, age was the most predictable factor for duodenal stump leakage (p= 0.034, p=0.044) CONCLUSIONS: Duodenal stump leakage was affected by the age. For older patients who undergo a radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer, the surgeon must pay meticulous attention to the transection and mobilization of the duodenum in order to prevent duodenal stump leakage.

Keywords

Male, Duodenum, Age Factors, Anastomosis, Roux-en-Y, Anastomotic Leak, Middle Aged, Logistic Models, Treatment Outcome, Gastrectomy, Risk Factors, Stomach Neoplasms, Multivariate Analysis, Odds Ratio, Humans, Female, Gastroenterostomy, Aged, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    16
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
16
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!