Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Component composition of Cryptococcus albidus and Eupenicillium erubescens alpha-L-rhamnosidases].

Authors: O V, Hudzenko; L D, Varbanets';

[Component composition of Cryptococcus albidus and Eupenicillium erubescens alpha-L-rhamnosidases].

Abstract

The component composition of Cryptococcus albidus and Eupenicillium erubescers alpha-L-rhamnosidases have studied. It was shown that enzymes have a monomeric structure. Enzyme preparations of C. albidus and E. erubescens have similar qualitative but differ in quantitative amino acid composition. alpha-L-rhamnosidase of C. albidus characterised by high amount of histidine, proline, cysteine, methionine in compared with alpha-L-rhamnosidase of E. erubescens. alpha-L-Rhamnosidase of E. erubescens, in contrast to the alpha-L-rhamnnosidase of C. albidus, contained higher levels of lysine, arginine, threonine, alanine, isoleucine, leucine, tyrosine, phenylalanine. It is shown that purified preparations of alpha-L-rhamnosidase C. albidus and E. erubescens contained 5 and 1% carbohydrates respectively. Enzyme preparations differ in quantitative monosaccharide composition, which represented by rhanmose, xylose, mannose, galactose and glucose. Furthermore, alpha-L-rhannosidase C. albidus contained fuicose, whereas alpha-L-rhamnosidase E. erubescens--ribose and arabinose. A significant percentage of hydrophobic amino acids, which is 31 and 34% of the total content, and the presence of the carbohydrate component are essential in stabilization of enzymes molecule.

Keywords

Molecular Weight, Cryptococcus, Glycoside Hydrolases, Monosaccharides, Eupenicillium, Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel, Amino Acids

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!