Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Magnetic resonance in neoplasms of the adipose, fibrous and muscular tissues].

Authors: L, Balzarini; E, Ceglia; R, Petrillo; J D, Tesoro Tess; A, Reitano; R, Musumeci;

[Magnetic resonance in neoplasms of the adipose, fibrous and muscular tissues].

Abstract

Two-hundred and three MR examinations were reviewed of 177 patients with lipomatous, fibrous and muscular tissues tumors which were evaluated at staging or during the follow-up. All examinations were obtained with a 1.5T superconductive magnet, and both T1 and T2-weighted images were acquired. Its high-contrast resolution, its direct multiplanarity and its allowing both T1 and T2-weighted images to be obtained, are the most important characteristics of MR imaging. In our experience, MRI demonstrated a high overall accuracy (96.1%)-95.2% at restaging alone--with similar sensitivity both at the staging of the disease (100%) and during the follow-up (97%). Overall sensibility was 97.6%. MR specificity in histologically proven relapses was 87.9%. Even though it is gradually assessing itself as the most important method in the evaluation of soft tissues masses, MRI allows an histological diagnosis to be made only in lipomatous tumors and in benign fibrous tumors, due to their specific signal features. The commonest though aspecific finding is a soft tissue mass with relatively low signal intensity in T1 and high signal intensity in T2-weighted images. In our opinion, MR imaging is the method of choice during the follow-up of the disease, whereas it is probably a complementary technique in the staging.

Keywords

Leiomyosarcoma, Histiocytoma, Benign Fibrous, Fibrosarcoma, Muscles, Soft Tissue Neoplasms, Fibroma, Liposarcoma, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Adipose Tissue, Muscular Diseases, Rhabdomyosarcoma, Humans, Lipoma, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!