Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

The effect of epidural low-dose morphine-soaked microfibrillar collagen sponge in postoperative pain control after laminectomy and instrumented fusion: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study.

Authors: Sirichai, Wilartratsami; Vimolluck, Sanansilp; Thanase, Ariyawatkul; Chatupon, Chotigavanichaya; Witchate, Pichaisak; Areesak, Chotivichit; Panya, Luksanapruksa;

The effect of epidural low-dose morphine-soaked microfibrillar collagen sponge in postoperative pain control after laminectomy and instrumented fusion: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study.

Abstract

To evaluate the postoperative analgesic effect and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after using epidural low-dose morphine-soaked microfibrillar collagen sponge (MMCS), as compared with placebo.A prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study was performed on patients under-going single-level posterior lumbar spinal decompression and instrumented fusion at the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Siriraj Hospital, between August 2012 and December 2013. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups to receive either an epidural MMCS or an epidural normal saline-soaked microfibrillar collagen sponge (placebo). Intensity ofpain, PONV and total amount of morphine were recorded at 4, 24, 48, and 72 hours, postoperatively.The analgesic effect was enhanced significantly in the epidural MMCS group, as the amount ofmorphine used was statistically less than in the placebo group at 4 and 24 hours (p < 0.05).A single low-dose epidural MMCS is effectiveforpain control after posterior lumbar spinal surgery with a low incidence of PONV.

Keywords

Adult, Male, Postoperative Pain, Lumbar Vertebrae, Morphine, Laminectomy, Middle Aged, Decompression, Surgical, Analgesia, Epidural, Analgesics, Opioid, Spinal Fusion, Double-Blind Method, Absorbable Implants, Animals, Humans, Female, Prospective Studies, Pain Measurement

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!