
pmid: 25349800
pmc: PMC4206888
To compare and evaluate the phacoemulsification parameters and postoperative endothelial cell changes of two different phacoemulsification machines, each with different modes, but also to assess the relationship between postoperative endothelial cell loss and the phacoemulsification parameters, as well as the other factors in both groups.This prospective observational study was comprised of consecutive eligible cataract patients operated with phacoemulsification technique performed by the same surgeon using either a WHITESTAR Signature Ellips FX (transversal, group 1) or Infiniti OZil IP (torsional, group 2) machine.The study included 86 patients. Baseline characteristics in the groups were similar. The median nuclear sclerosis grade was 3 (2-4) in the first group and 2 (2-4) in the second group (P=0.265). Both groups had similar phacoemulsification needle times (group 1: 60.63±36 s; group 2: 55.98±30 s; P=0.789). The percentage of endothelial cell loss 30d after surgery ranged from 3% to 15% with a median of 7% in group 1, and from 2% to 13% with a median of 6% in group 2; however, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups (P=0.407). Hexagonality (P=0.794) and the coefficient of variation (CV; P=0.142) did not differ significantly between the groups before and 30d after surgery. A significant positive correlation was found between the endothelial cell loss and nuclear sclerosis grade (group 1: P<0.001; group 2: P<0.001) and between the endothelial cell loss and average phacoemulsification power (group 1: P=0.007; group 2: P=0.008).Both of these machines were efficient, with similar endothelial cell loss. This endothelial cell loss was related to the increased nuclear sclerosis grade and increased phacoemulsification power.
Ophthalmology, transversal, phacoemulsification, torsional, RE1-994, endothelial cell changes
Ophthalmology, transversal, phacoemulsification, torsional, RE1-994, endothelial cell changes
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 14 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
