Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Anticoagulation: choosing the optimal anticoagulant.

Authors: Emily M, Hawes; Anthony J, Viera;

Anticoagulation: choosing the optimal anticoagulant.

Abstract

The risks of bleeding and thrombosis should be considered in decisions on whether to initiate anticoagulation therapy. Oral anticoagulation is indicated for patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who are at intermediate or high risk of stroke (CHADS2 [Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age at least 75 years, Diabetes, previous Stroke or transient ischemic attack] score of 1 or higher). Apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or warfarin can be considered for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in these patients. Hospitalized patients at high risk of thrombosis should receive prophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin, low-dose unfractionated heparin, or fondaparinux, whereas those at low risk should not receive pharmacologic prophylaxis. Pharmacologic prophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin or low-dose unfractionated heparin is indicated for patients undergoing nonorthopedic surgery who are at high risk of thrombosis and those undergoing orthopedic surgery whose risk of bleeding is low. Patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome should receive intravenous unfractionated heparin or enoxaparin at hospital admission. Anticoagulation with warfarin is appropriate for patients with mechanical heart valves. Patients with deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism should receive rivaroxaban, dabigatran, or warfarin.

Keywords

Patient Selection, Decision Making, Embolism, Anticoagulants, Thrombosis, Risk Assessment, Stroke, Postoperative Complications, Cardiovascular Diseases, Risk Factors, Heart Valve Prosthesis, Humans, Practice Patterns, Physicians'

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!