Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Performance and clinical evaluation of antinuclear antibody test based on fluorescence enzyme immunoassay].

Authors: Naomi, Watanabe; Ritsuko, Nagatomo; Shigeo, Okubo; Hiromitsu, Yokota; Hitoshi, Ikeda; Yutaka, Yatomi;

[Performance and clinical evaluation of antinuclear antibody test based on fluorescence enzyme immunoassay].

Abstract

The measurement of antinuclear antibodies (ANA) is used for screening of connective tissue diseases (CTD) in the laboratory. ANA detection is performed by indirect immunofluorescence (IF) assay on HEp-2 cells from human larynx carcinoma. However, it lacks specificity for the identification of specific diseases and antigen reactivity. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the EliA CTD Screen (EliA), a new enzyme fluoroimmunoassay (Phadia AB, Uppsala, Sweden) for detection of ANA in human serum.The study involved a total of 732 serum samples, 200 from healthy donors, 297 from patients with CTD and 235 from patients with rheumatoid arthritis, vasculitis syndrome and relative disease of CTD. For all sera, ANA was measured by IF, commercial assay (MESACUP) and EliA.The sensitivity and specificity of EliA were 73.7% and 78.7%, respectively, whereas those of MESACUP were 80.8% and 64.7%, respectively. Area under the receiver operating curves for EliA, MESACUP and IF were 0.821, 0.786 and 0.730, respectively. The concordance rate between EliA and MESACUP was 84.2%. These discrepancies between those 2 assays were found in 84 sera. Further investigation were done by each ANA antigen tests for the discrepant results of EliA in 83 sera. The discrepancies might be occurred by antigen difference or non-specific response.AUC results showed that the diagnostic performance of EliA was superior to MESACUP and IF. EliA had a good performance as method for screening of CTD.

Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Fluoroimmunoassay, Middle Aged, Immunoenzyme Techniques, Antibodies, Antinuclear, Humans, Mass Screening, Female, Connective Tissue Diseases, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!