Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Evaluation of hyperprolactinaemia with the use of the intervals for prolactin after macroforms separation.

Authors: K, Beda-Maluga; H, Pisarek; J, Komorowski; J, Swietoslawski; J, Fuss-Chmielewska; K, Winczyk;

Evaluation of hyperprolactinaemia with the use of the intervals for prolactin after macroforms separation.

Abstract

Macroprolactin (MaPRL) - a complex of monomeric prolactin (PRL) with immunoglobulin G, may be a cause of laboratory diagnosed hyperprolactinaemia. To quantify MaPRL, a precipitation with polyethylene glycol may be performed. This method involves calculating of recovery ratio but the cut-off value is not precisely determined. Moreover, it is proposed that the assessment of macroprolactinaemia should include also the evaluation of real PRL concentration which means the level of the hormone after macroforms separation. The study included 245 patients with hyperprolactinaemia, in whom precipitation was performed. A recovery ratio ≤40% indicated macroprolactinaemia. The real PRL concentrations of the studied subjects were compared with reference ranges suggested by the assay manufacturer and with new intervals for PRL after macroforms separation. On the base of the recovery ratio after the precipitation, macroprolactinaemia was detected in 21 persons. In these patients true hyperprolactinaemia (elevation of real PRL concentration above manufacturer's reference ranges) was noted in 9 cases. Among 224 patients with a recovery >40%, real PRL concentration turned out to be within the manufacturer's reference range (pseudohyperprolactinaemia) in 36 persons. The new intervals for PRL after macroforms separation were about 20% lower than the manufacturer's reference ranges. After applying new ranges in patients with macroprolactinaemia, true hyperprolactinaemia was observed in 14 persons, while in the group without MaPRL dominance, pseudohyperprolactinaemia was noted in 5 patients. The use of the recovery ratio only to recognize macroprolactinaemia may lead in some subjects to the misclassification of the results. For that reason the assessment of the PRL concentration after macroforms separation that can help to distinguish true hyperprolactinaemia and pseudohyperprolactinaemia, seems to be reasonable. To evaluate the real PRL concentration, the reference intervals suggested by the manufacturer of immunoassay might be used. However, possibly better means to diagnose patients with hyperprolactinaemia accurately is using an appropriate range for the concentration of PRL after macroforms separation.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Immunoassay, Male, Middle Aged, Polyethylene Glycols, Prolactin, Hyperprolactinemia, Young Adult, Reference Values, Humans, Female

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    5
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
5
Average
Average
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!