Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Risk assessment of nanoparticles in consumer products].

Authors: S, Hackenberg;

[Risk assessment of nanoparticles in consumer products].

Abstract

Nanomaterials are not just used in various areas of scientific research, but are increasingly found in consumer products. Particularly the cosmetic and textile industries, as well as the medical branch benefit from the specific chemical and physical properties of nanoparticles (NPs). However, the knowledge base concerning the potential health hazards that nanomaterials hold for humans is far from complete. NPs mainly enter the organism via the lungs or the gastrointestinal tract, where they can accumulate. Transcutaneous penetration is most unlikely in the case of healthy skin. Chronic inflammatory reactions of the airways are particularly relevant in the context of potential risks to human health. Evidence for a geno- and cytotoxic potential of some of the most frequently used NPs is available from cell culture and animal experiments. Therefore, the risk of NP-induced cancerogenesis cannot be ruled out. Currently available nanotoxicological data is partly contradictory, due to differing characteristics of the tested substances and variable experimental settings. Long-term studies using continuous NP exposure in consumer-relevant dosages are needed. Additionally, the molecular mechanisms of NP-induced toxicity have to be elucidated in detail.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Consumer Product Safety, Mutagenicity Tests, Materials Testing, Animals, Humans, Nanoparticles, Nanotechnology, Biological Assay, Risk Assessment

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!