Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Fifteen-year kidney graft survival.

Authors: Y W, Cho; P I, Terasaki; B, Graver;

Fifteen-year kidney graft survival.

Abstract

1. Among patients transplanted in 93 selected centers with good follow-up data, the 10-year graft survival of first cadaver-donor transplants was 18%, parental donor grafts 39%, and HLA-identical sibling donor grafts 66%. The respective half-lives were 6.8, 10.8, and 24.5 years. The donor relationship has been the most important factor in long-term success. 2. Patient half-life for recipients younger than 16 was 36 years; for recipients 16-50 years old it was 17.6 years, and for those over age 50, it was 10.4 years. This marked difference in patient half-lives severely affected functional graft half-lives for the 3 age groups; 6.8, 10.3, and 16.7 years, respectively. However, the differences in patient survival for the 3 age groups were not significantly reflected in graft half-lives that were 6.8, 7.7, and 6.5 years, respectively. Thus, graft loss resulting from rejection was significantly lower in older than in younger patients. 3. Cadaver-donor kidneys with cold ischemia time up to 12 hours and half-lives of 9.1 years in transplants performed before 1975, compared to half-lives of 6.4 years for those with more than 24 hours cold ischemia time. In transplants performed between 1980 and 1983, the half-life of kidneys with cold ischemia time up to 12 hours was 8.7 years, compared to 6.9 years for those with more than 24 hours cold ischemia time. The long-term effect of cold ischemia persists but has diminished in recent years. 4. HLA-A,B loci matching had a significant effect on long-term graft survival. The 10-year graft survival of A,B matched grafts was 30% compared to 18% for 3 or 4 HLA-A,B mismatched transplants. This difference increased at 15 years to 25% in the matched grafts and 10% in the mismatched grafts. 5. A very strong recipient race effect was evidenced by the 24% 10-year graft survival in Whites compared to 10% in Blacks. The half-lives were 8.2 in Whites and 4.8 in Blacks. 6. A listing of 15-year graft survivors has been compiled according to transplantation centers. There was a total of 969 from cadaver donors, 283 from parental donors, and 457 from sibling donors. 7. An analysis of the characteristics of the 15-year graft survivors showed a preponderance of patients with favorable factors, noted in the analysis above. As might be expected, the most striking was the fact that 27% of the 15-year survivors had received kidneys from sibling donors, despite the fact that such donors comprised only 17% of those transplanted in the pre-1975 era.

Keywords

Adult, Reoperation, Adolescent, Graft Survival, Age Factors, Organ Preservation, Middle Aged, Kidney Transplantation, HLA Antigens, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Registries

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    8
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
8
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!