Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Diagnostic options. Indications and validity].

Authors: A, Stallmach; M, Bürger; M, Weber;

[Diagnostic options. Indications and validity].

Abstract

A variety of diagnostic methods provide the necessary rational basis for diagnosis, assessment of disease activity and exclusion of possible complications for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).Currently, a wide range of diagnostic methods is available and easily accessible. The clinical use of all these different methods is inherently possible. As there is no reference test for either diagnosis or monitoring of IBD, diagnostic techniques must be selected, applied and interpreted in an appropriate clinical context. The objective is to evaluate the clinical, laboratory and imaging techniques including ultrasound and endoscopy in different clinical situations.In addition to clinical parameters, fecal calprotectin and abdominal ultrasound are helpful tools to assess the inflammatory activity. In patients with high inflammatory activity, a routine endoscopy is not beneficial. At best, endoscopy can be performed to document the extent of mucosal inflammation before initiating an intensified immunosuppressive therapy. Knowledge and experience in the management and treatment of IBD complications are critical in providing a rational use of specific diagnostic methods.As a basic principle, the critical evaluation of diagnostic methods in patients with IBD is of great importance. Specific clinical situations require specific diagnostic techniques. Every diagnostic method performed should have a purpose.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Reproducibility of Results, Validation Studies as Topic, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Sensitivity and Specificity, Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal, Diagnosis, Differential, Feces, Chronic Disease, Humans, Leukocyte L1 Antigen Complex, Biomarkers, Ultrasonography

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!