
In this paper, we will describe the core themes behind the practice of Intentional Peer Support (IPS), offering a unique perspective on what has commonly been described as "mental illness" and the power dynamics inherent in traditional helping relationships. Through intentional conversations that explore "how we've come to know what we know" and challenge the naming of our experience by others, we begin to find new ways of understanding and responding to our own and other people's experiences. In addition, we emphasize the importance of mutuality in relationships. Both people share responsibility for the relationship, and no one is assumed to be the sole holder of "truth". Mutuality becomes harder but even more critical to practice when we begin to fear for "safety" of the other. It is our belief that as we practice IPS across all relationships in our lives, we can begin to tackle some of the complex ways in which language, roles, power and culture have contributed to our own sense of internalized oppression in any form.
Mental Disorders, Humans, Social Support, Intention, Peer Group
Mental Disorders, Humans, Social Support, Intention, Peer Group
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
