
handle: 2434/483600
The aim of this paper is to show that some items, often mentioned in the Egyptological literature — including authoritative reference works — as more probably or surely belonging to the funerary equipment of Thutmose III, or simply considered as intrusive material from his tomb (KV 34), actually they do not. Nicholas Reeves in his Valley of the Kings: the decline of a royal necropolis had already questioned the attribution to the burial equipment of Thutmose III of some of the objects that are here examined and it has been possible to confirm most of his hypotheses. The documents preserved in the Egyptological Archives of the Università degli Studi di Milano, especially the excavation journal to the tomb of Thutmose III made by Victor Loret in 1898, constituted the most reliable source on which this research has been based.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
