
handle: 2434/23839
Every normal modal logic L gives rise to the consequence relation \phi |=L \psi which holds if, and only if, \psi is true in a world of an L-model whenever \phi is true in that world. We consider the following algorithmic problem for L. Given two modal formulas \phi_1 and \phi_2, decide whether \phi_1\wedge \psi_2 is a conservative extension of \phi_1 in the sense that whenever \phi_1 \wedge \phi_2 |=L \psi and \psi does not contain propositional variables not occurring in \phi_1, then \phi_1 |=L \psi. We first prove that the conservativeness problem is coNExpTime-hard for all modal logics of unbounded width (which have rooted frames with more than N successors of the root, for any N < \omega). Then we show that this problem is (i) coNExpTime-complete for S5 and K, (ii) in ExpSpace for S4 and (iii) ExpSpace-complete for GL.3 (the logic of finite strict linear orders). The proofs for S5 and K use the fact that these logics have uniform interpolants of exponential size.
modal logic. conservative extensions
modal logic. conservative extensions
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
