Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Laboratory detection of primary and acquired drug resistance in human lymphatic neoplasms.

Authors: L M, Weisenthal; P L, Dill; J Z, Finklestein; T E, Duarte; J A, Baker; E M, Moran;

Laboratory detection of primary and acquired drug resistance in human lymphatic neoplasms.

Abstract

We tested the ability of the differential staining cytotoxicity (DiSC) assay to discriminate between sensitive and resistant cell populations in human lymphatic neoplasms. First, the in vitro activity spectra of the most important drugs paralleled the known clinical activity spectra of the same agents. Second, there were highly significant correlations between in vitro chemosensitivity and the results of clinical chemotherapy. Third, specimens from previously untreated patients were significantly more sensitive to the most important drugs than were specimens from patients who had previously received chemotherapy. Finally, metachronous assays performed on specimens from the same patients showed little change in chemosensitivity if there had been no intervening chemotherapy between the times that the first and second assays were performed. However, if the patients had received intervening chemotherapy between the times of the first and second assays, the specimens in the second assays tended to be significantly more resistant than were the specimens in the first assays. These data indicate that the DiSC assay may be of value in the design of strategies to circumvent drug resistance in human lymphatic neoplasms.

Keywords

Leukemia, Lymphoma, Staining and Labeling, Drug Resistance, Antineoplastic Agents, Colony-Forming Units Assay, Drug Evaluation, Humans, Lymph Nodes, Prospective Studies, Multiple Myeloma, Tumor Stem Cell Assay

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    53
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
53
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!