Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[PP2 enhances intercellular communication of gap junction in breast cancer Hs578T cells].

Authors: Shu-Ying, Dong; Chao, Zheng; Guo-Jun, Jiang; Xi, Han; Xu-Hui, Tong;

[PP2 enhances intercellular communication of gap junction in breast cancer Hs578T cells].

Abstract

To investigate the effect of Src kinase inhibitor PP2 on intercellular communication of gap junction in breast cancer cells.Cultured breast cancer Hs578T cells were treated with various concentrations of pp2 (0,1,2,4,8,16,32 μmol/L) for 24h. Cell growth was determined by MTT assay; dye spread in Hs578T cells was measured by Parachute assay; and the expression of Src kinase in Hs578T cells was detected by Western blot.MTT assay showed that the survive rate of Hs578T cells treated with PP2 (1 ≊ 8 μmol/L) was 98% ± 3% ≊ 94 % ± 4%. Parachute assay showed that compared to control group the standard normalized dye spread rates of Hs578T cells treated with 1,2,4 and 8 μmol/L PP2 were 1.60 ± 0.08,2.00 ± 0.05,2.20 ± 0.05 and 2.70 ± 0.09,respectively (all P<0.01). Moreover,compared to control group at the same time points,the standard normalized dye spread of Hs578T cells treated with 8 μmol/L PP2 for 6,12 and 24 h were 1.4 ± 0.05,1.7 ± 0.06,and 2.2 ± 0.07,respectively (all P<0.01). Western blot showed that the expression ratios of Src kinase/β-actin of Hs578T cells treated with 1,2,4 and 8 μmol/L PP2 for 24 h were 0.93 ± 0.02,0.70 ± 0.09,0.66 ± 0.09 and 0.36 ± 0.10,which were significantly inhibited compared with control group (P<0.05 or 0.01). And the expression ratio of Src kinase/β-actin of Hs578T cells treated with 8 μmol/L PP2 for 6,12 and 24h was 0.82 ± 0.03,0.66 ± 0.08 and 0.59 ±0.09, which were all inhibited significantly compared to control group (P<0.01).PP2 enhances the gap junction function in breast cancer Hs578T cells, which is probably related to the inhibition of Src kinase.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Pyrimidines, src-Family Kinases, Cell Line, Tumor, Gap Junctions, Humans, Breast Neoplasms, Female

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!