
pmid: 24152832
handle: 2434/232802 , 11391/1418001 , 11381/2864247
Recurrent respiratory tract infections (RRTIs) are very common in children and a major challenge for pediatricians. They affect the children's quality of life, cause absences from school and lost parental working days, and repeated medical examinations, hospital admissions as well as antibiotic therapies lead to high costs for society. Given their prevalence and clinical importance, various prevention strategies have been developed. One of the most widely used is the administration of immunostimulants: i.e. molecules of bacterial or synthetic origin that interact with immunological mechanisms in vitro and in vivo. A number of studies have investigated their effects on cellular and innate immunity, and their clinical efficacy, but there is no consensus as to their real usefulness. The main aim of this review is to analyse the available data concerning the activity and efficacy of immunostimulants in preventing pediatric RRTIs. The majority of studies have shown that the number of infections decreases after immunostimulant treatment, but they are affected by various methodological weaknesses. Further studies are urgently needed to confirm whether, when and which immunostimulants should be used. Copyright
Recurrent respiratory tract infections (RRTIs) are very common in children and a major challenge for pediatricians. They affect the children's quality of life, cause absences from school and lost parental working days, and repeated medical examinations, hospital admissions as well as antibiotic therapies lead to high costs for society. Given their prevalence and clinical importance, various prevention strategies have been developed. One of the most widely used is the administration of immunostimulants: i.e. molecules of bacterial or synthetic origin that interact with immunological mechanisms in vitro and in vivo. A number of studies have investigated their effects on cellular and innate immunity, and their clinical efficacy, but there is no consensus as to their real usefulness. The main aim of this review is to analyse the available data concerning the activity and efficacy of immunostimulants in preventing pediatric RRTIs. The majority of studies have shown that the number of infections decreases after immunostimulant treatment, but they are affected by various methodological weaknesses. Further studies are urgently needed to confirm whether, when and which immunostimulants should be used.
Clinical Trials as Topic, Adjuvants, Immunologic ; Clinical Trials as Topic ; Humans; Meta-Analysis as Topic ; Pyrrolidonecarboxylic Acid ; Recurrence ; Respiratory Tract Infections ; Thiazolidines, Pyrrolidonecarboxylic Acid, 618, Adjuvants, Immunologic, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Immunologic, Recurrence, 616, Respiratory Tract Infection, Humans, Thiazolidines, Adjuvants; Immunologic; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Pyrrolidonecarboxylic Acid; Recurrence; Respiratory Tract Infections; Thiazolidines, Respiratory Tract Infections, Adjuvant, Human
Clinical Trials as Topic, Adjuvants, Immunologic ; Clinical Trials as Topic ; Humans; Meta-Analysis as Topic ; Pyrrolidonecarboxylic Acid ; Recurrence ; Respiratory Tract Infections ; Thiazolidines, Pyrrolidonecarboxylic Acid, 618, Adjuvants, Immunologic, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Immunologic, Recurrence, 616, Respiratory Tract Infection, Humans, Thiazolidines, Adjuvants; Immunologic; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Pyrrolidonecarboxylic Acid; Recurrence; Respiratory Tract Infections; Thiazolidines, Respiratory Tract Infections, Adjuvant, Human
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 16 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
