Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[The value of the red-green test].

Authors: H, Körner;

[The value of the red-green test].

Abstract

The causes of chromatic aberration were elucidated by Newton in 1704, though in regard to the eye the phenomenon has been a subject of controversy. The chromatic aberration of the eye has long been used to determine refraction. In principle, blurred coloured circles are visible which depend on the chromatic aberration of the eye and lead to perception of different contrasts in the dark optotypes presented in the two coloured fields, depending on the real ametropia or correction conditions. Uniform perception of contrast by the subject is used as the criterion for correction. As regards the red-green test, it appears doubtful that the results are not influenced by protanopia and brunescent cataract. Therefore, the contrast thresholds of 8 protanopic patients and 5 patients with brunescent cataract were examined. This was done using special red and green lenses (produced by VEB Carl Zeiss Jena) under individual conditions with Landolt's rings. Characteristic differences in the contrast thresholds for red and green were found. For bichromatic tests no procedure has been defined, and neither the wave-lengths to be used nor the reference wavelength have been laid down. The results can be affected by numerous physical, physiological and pathological factors. The accuracy and practical usefulness of red-green tests are questionable. Therefore, it does not appear justified to equip ophthalmological examination instruments for such tests.

Keywords

Color Perception Tests, Eyeglasses, Accommodation, Ocular, Humans, Refraction, Ocular, Cataract

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!