
A study on histological findings in 1047 patients who underwent total axillary lymph node dissection (topographical levels I-III), was conducted. A mean of 20.3 lymph nodes (LN) was assessed; LN metastases were detected in 492 cases. Retrospective analysis showed that, by mere dissection of LNs level I, 10 of the 492 nodal positive cases (2.0%) would have been classified false negative. Additionally, according to the number of positive LNs detected in stage I, 85 of the 492 patients (17%) would have been assigned to a group with a better prognosis (prognostic groups 1-3, 4-9, greater than or equal to 10 pos. LNs). By mere dissection of LNs levels I and II, only 1 of 492 (0.2%) patients would have been categorized false negative and only 24 patients (5%) would have been included in a group with a better prognosis, on the basis of the number of positive LNs dissected. Thus dissection of LNs stages I and II provides sufficient prognostic information. Since, however, in 145 nodal positive cases (14% of the entire collective e.g. 29.5% of all patients with positive lymph nodes), metastases were detected in level III, these LNs should be removed as well, in order to prevent axillary recurrences. One could only dispense with dissection of level III, if LN metastases levels I and II could be excluded during the operation.
Lymphatic Metastasis, Axilla, Humans, Lymph Node Excision, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Lymph Nodes, Prognosis
Lymphatic Metastasis, Axilla, Humans, Lymph Node Excision, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Lymph Nodes, Prognosis
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
