Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Megakaryocytic leukemia cell lines and megakaryocytic leukemia].

Authors: R, Ryo; A, Yoshida; N, Yamaguchi;

[Megakaryocytic leukemia cell lines and megakaryocytic leukemia].

Abstract

Using the megakaryocytic leukemia cell lines, K-562 and CMK established from a Down's patient with acute megakaryoblastic leukemia, we studied the changes of antigen expression, cytosolic Ca2+ mobilization, thromboxane (TX) A2 formation and gene expression during megakaryocyte differentiation. We found that thrombospondin synthesis and platelet factor (PF)-4 gene expression were specific for mature megakaryoblasts, whereas collagen unresponsiveness and prostaglandin E1-induced Ca2+ mobilization were noted in immature megakaryoblasts alone. This experiment shows that functional and genetic analysis are useful for characterizing the leukemic megakaryoblastic cells. We analyzed the clinical, hematologic and genetic features of 4 patients with M7, and acute megakaryoblastic transformation of CML, MDS and essential thrombocythemia. In two patients, prednisolone and 6-MP were effective in cytoreduction. In 3 patients with increased platelet counts, normal CFU-Meg formation, the megakaryoblasts with platelet production, or the coexistence of immature megakaryoblasts with mature megakaryocytes were observed, thus indicating that some megakaryoblastic leukemia cells still have the capacity of differentiation. One patient had megakaryoblastic cells with PF-4 gene expression. These clinical findings suggest that the megakaryoblastic leukemia could not be characterized as usual leukemia and a more sensitive marker is required to differentiate leukemic megakaryoblasts from normal megakaryoblasts.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, Gene Expression, Cell Differentiation, Middle Aged, Platelet Factor 4, Thromboxane A2, Leukemia, Megakaryoblastic, Acute, Tumor Cells, Cultured, Humans, Female, Megakaryocytes, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!