
Health-related quality of life issues in patients with cutaneous malignancies is being re-explored. This is motivated by the heavy burden they put on dermatological care, it is more and more considered a chronic disease and new non-invasive therapies are being introduced. The purpose of this review is to identify the relevant quality of life (QOL) issues and to summarize the instruments used for investigating QOL in keratinocyte carcinoma patients. With a systematic literature search in Embase, MEDLINE OvidSP, PubMed publisher and Cochrane Central, 10 questionnaires and 4 studies reporting on quality of life issues were identified. Generic (UK Sickness Impact profile [UKSIP], Short Form 36-item Health Survey [SF-36], Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General [FACT-G]) and dermatology specific (Dermatology Life Quality Index [DLQI] and Skindex-29, -16, -17) instruments demonstrated little to no QOL impairment. This may be explained by failing to capture the relevant domains such as "emotions", "appearance" and "anxiety". Skin cancer specific questionnaires (Skin Cancer Index [SCI], Skin Cancer Quality of Life Impact Tool [SCQOLIT] and Actinic Keratosis Quality of Life [AKQoL]) demonstrated good validity and responsiveness and represent the effect on QOL properly. However, there are some points of critique to these questionnaires. Optimal management of patients with actinic neoplasia syndrome and the selection and evaluation of therapies may benefit from the use of PROs in this ever increasing population.
Keratinocytes, Skin Neoplasms, EMC MM-03-61-05-A, Surveys and Questionnaires, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Quality of Life, Humans, Basal Cell Carcinoma
Keratinocytes, Skin Neoplasms, EMC MM-03-61-05-A, Surveys and Questionnaires, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Quality of Life, Humans, Basal Cell Carcinoma
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 10 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
