Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Thoracoscopic sympathectomy for hyperhidrosis].

Authors: Miguel, Guerra; Paulo C, Neves;

[Thoracoscopic sympathectomy for hyperhidrosis].

Abstract

Primary hyperhidrosis affects between 1 and 3% of the population. It is a problem of sympathetic deregulation which is characterized by profuse sweating on the palmar surface of the hands, armpits, groin and feet. The therapeutic options for the management of hyperhidrosis have traditionally been non-operative. However, there are several studies demonstrating that primary hyperhidrosis is best treated by endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy.This article presents a review of existing approaches and techniques of thoracoscopic sympathectomy for treatment of hyperhidrosis as well as the author's summary and preferences.Thoracoscopic sympathectomy is now the standard procedure chosen for the treatment of severe hyperhidrosis. It is safe and successful in almost 98% of cases and only 1-2% of patients experience recurrence. All patients develop some degree of compensatory sweating after surgery. In most this is mild and tolerable; however, in 3-5% of patients it is severe and intolerable. The patients should be made aware that the most satisfied patients are those with preoperative palmar or palmar- axillary hyperhidrosis.The best segment interrupted for the treatment of primary hyperhidrosis, is still controversial. The recent body of literature suggests that the highest success rates occur when interruption is performed at the top of R3 or the top of R4 for palmar hyperhidrosis. R4 may offer a lower incidence of compensatory hyperhidrosis but moister hands. For palmar and axillary and only axillary hyperhidrosis interruptions at R4 and R5 are recommended. The top of R3 is best for craniofacial hyperhidrosis.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Thoracoscopy, Axilla, Humans, Hyperhidrosis, Sympathectomy, Hand

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!