Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

The characterisation of mesenchymal stem cells: a stem cell is not a stem cell is not a stem cell.

Authors: Wasim S, Khan; Timothy E, Hardingham;

The characterisation of mesenchymal stem cells: a stem cell is not a stem cell is not a stem cell.

Abstract

There has been an increasing interest in stem cell applications and tissue engineering approaches in surgical practice to deal with damaged or lost tissue. Although there have been developments in almost all surgical disciplines, the greatest advances are being made in orthopaedics. This is due to many factors including the familiarity with bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells. Unfortunately significant hurdles remain to be overcome in many areas before tissue engineering becomes more routinely used in clinical practice. Stem cells have been identified in a number of adult tissues, albeit in small numbers. In addition to bone marrow, mesenchymal stem cells have been identified in a number of tissues including adipose tissue and fat pad. The mesenchymal stem cells are generally isolated from the tissue and expanded in culture. These cells are characterised or defined using a set of cell surface markers; mesenchymal stem cells are generally positive for CD44, CD90 and CD105, and are negative for haematopoetic markers CD34 and CD45, and the neurogenic marker CD56. In this paper the characterisation of stem cells is discussed followed by preliminary evidence suggesting that pericytes may be a candidate stem cell.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Animals, Humans, Bone Marrow Cells, Mesenchymal Stem Cells, Pericytes, Biomarkers

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    4
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
4
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!