
A computing strategy to update the inverse of the genomic relationship matrix when new genotypes become available is described. It is shown that re-using results of previous computations can result in substantial reductions in computing time required. For instance, when the number of individuals increased by about 1% for matrices larger than 15,000, the time required for updating was less than 7% of that used for direct inversion from scratch.
Genome, Livestock, Genotype, Models, Genetic, Animals, Computational Biology
Genome, Livestock, Genotype, Models, Genetic, Animals, Computational Biology
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
