Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Rigid ureteroscopy: results and complications].

Authors: E, Franco Miranda; F, Vigues Julia; X, Tesedo Cubero; M A, López Costea; M, Pérez Céspedes; A, Gil-Vernet Sedo; J, Rodríguez Tolra; +1 Authors

[Rigid ureteroscopy: results and complications].

Abstract

We make an evaluation of 66 ureteroscopies (URS) carried out in our Service over a period of 18 months. In 55 cases it was done for therapeutic purposes in ureteral lithiasis, and in 11 cases it was for diagnostic purposes. In the treatment of lithiasis resolutive effectivity at the first attempt was 68%, in 9% ureterolithotomy had to be performed due to the impossibility of approaching the calculus, and in 23% supplementary treatment was carried out by means of external litrotripsy. In the diagnostic field, effectivity was 72%. Notable complications arose in 6 cases (9%), 6 ureteral perforations, in three of which a urinoma was formed, all settled with a double J catheter. Open surgery was not resorted to in any case. No sequelae were observed and this technique therefore showed itself to be safe and effective.

Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Ureteral Calculi, Endoscopy, Middle Aged, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Humans, Ureteral Diseases, Female, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!