
pmid: 23339502
handle: 20.500.14802/10839
The analysis of nursing errors in clinical management highlighted that clinical handover plays a pivotal role in patient safety. Changes to handover including conducting handover at the bedside and the use of written handover summary sheets were subsequently implemented. The aim of the study was to explore nurses' perspectives on the introduction of bedside handover and the use of written handover sheets. Using a qualitative approach, data were obtained from six focus groups containing 30 registered and enrolled (licensed practical) nurses. Thematic analysis revealed several major themes. Themes identified included: bedside handover and the strengths and weaknesses; patient involvement in handover, and good communication is about good communicators. Finally, three sources of patient information and other issues were also identified as key aspects. How bedside handover is delivered should be considered in relation to specific patient caseloads (patients with cognitive impairments), the shift (day, evening or night shift) and the model of service delivery (team versus patient allocation). Flexible handover methods are implicit within clinical setting issues especially in consideration to nursing teamwork. Good communication processes continue to be fundamental for successful handover processes.
Adult, Male, Patient Care Team, Communication, Patient Handoff, handoff, Focus Groups, Middle Aged, bedside handover, 310, information barriers, Young Adult, XXXXXX - Unknown, Humans, Female, Patient Safety, communication processes, patient handover
Adult, Male, Patient Care Team, Communication, Patient Handoff, handoff, Focus Groups, Middle Aged, bedside handover, 310, information barriers, Young Adult, XXXXXX - Unknown, Humans, Female, Patient Safety, communication processes, patient handover
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 43 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
